Investors who want dividend growth exposure with broad diversification across ~400 U.S. stocks. Anyone in the accumulation phase who wants a slightly higher starting yield than VIG (~2.0% vs. ~1.7%) while still benefiting from dividend compounding. Investors who prefer the iShares ecosystem or want a broader dividend-growth screen that captures companies with shorter but solid growth streaks.
Investors seeking maximum current yield — SCHD pays roughly twice as much today (~3.5%). Retirees relying on portfolio income for living expenses will find DGRO's ~2.0% yield modest compared to higher-yielding alternatives. Anyone who wants ultra-conservative dividend durability — NOBL's 25+ year requirement is a significantly stricter screen than DGRO's 5-year bar.
DGRO sacrifices some screening strictness for broader diversification and slightly higher yield. Its 5-year dividend growth requirement captures companies that are solid growers but haven't yet proven themselves over a full decade. The result is a portfolio with more holdings, more sector diversity, and ~0.3% more current yield than VIG — but at the cost of holding companies with shorter dividend growth track records. Over full market cycles, DGRO's total returns roughly track the S&P 500, similar to VIG.
Key metrics
Fund snapshot
| Ticker | DGRO |
| Underlying Index | Morningstar US Dividend Growth Index |
| Expense Ratio | 0.08% |
| AUM (approx.) | ~$39.7 billion |
| Inception Date | June 10, 2014 |
| Distribution Frequency | Quarterly (Mar, Jun, Sep, Dec) |
| Sponsor | BlackRock (iShares) |
| Number of Holdings | ~394 |
| 30-Day SEC Yield | ~2.0–2.3% (verify current) |
| Avg Daily Volume | ~2.5 million shares |
Verify current data at iShares' official fund page. Yields and AUM change.
Performance snapshot
| Period | DGRO Return | Dividend Category Avg | S&P 500 (VOO) |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 Year | ~8–12% | ~4–6% | roughly tracks |
| 3 Year (ann.) | ~5–8% | ~3–5% | tracks |
| 5 Year (ann.) | ~10–14% | ~7–9% | roughly tracks |
| 10 Year (ann.) | — | — | — |
Returns shown as approximate ranges. Verify exact figures at iShares. Past performance is not indicative of future results.
DGRO's performance story mirrors VIG's because both screen for dividend growth rather than yield. Over full market cycles, DGRO has produced total returns that roughly track the S&P 500 — it is essentially a broad U.S. equity portfolio with a dividend-growth overlay. The fund launched in June 2014, so it does not yet have a 10-year track record, but its ~12-year history shows consistent participation in market rallies while maintaining a meaningful tilt toward companies with proven dividend growth histories.
What it is and why it matters
What it actually is
DGRO tracks the Morningstar US Dividend Growth Index — a dividend-growth screen that requires companies to have declared and paid dividends for at least 5 consecutive years. That immediately excludes most of the market: companies in high-growth phases, biotech firms, early-stage technology companies, and any business that has not yet reached profitability or decided to return capital to shareholders. The remaining candidates are ranked on their dividend growth characteristics, and the top ~394 by composite score make the cut.
The result is a portfolio that looks different from both high-yield dividend ETFs and ultra-selective dividend growth funds. DGRO has meaningful exposure to technology — Microsoft, Apple, Broadcom, and other tech companies that have grown their dividends steadily over five or more years. Healthcare (UnitedHealth, Johnson & Johnson), financials (JPMorgan, Bank of America), and consumer staples (Procter & Gamble) also have substantial weightings. The fund is not heavy in the traditional value sectors that dominate high-yield dividend funds like VYM. It is a broad U.S. equity portfolio with a dividend-growth overlay — similar in philosophy to VIG but with a lower screening bar and broader universe.
The 5-year screen vs. VIG's 10-year screen
This is the single most important distinction between DGRO and its closest competitor, VIG. DGRO requires only 5 consecutive years of dividend increases while VIG requires 10+. The practical result: DGRO holds ~400 stocks vs. VIG's ~340, yields slightly more (~2.0% vs. ~1.7%), and includes companies that are solid dividend growers but haven't yet proven themselves over a full decade. Both funds charge nearly the same (DGRO at 0.08%, VIG at 0.06%) and both produce total returns that roughly track the S&P 500.
The choice between them comes down to selectivity versus breadth. VIG's 10-year bar is a meaningful filter that produces a portfolio of companies with proven durability through multiple economic cycles. DGRO's 5-year bar is broader and captures more recent dividend growers, which can be attractive for investors who want slightly higher current yield and more diversification without sacrificing the core dividend-growth philosophy. Neither fund is objectively better — they serve different preferences within the same Earn slot category.
Cost analysis
DGRO charges 0.08% annually — $8 per $10,000 invested. That is slightly higher than VIG's 0.06% ($6 per $10,000) but still among the cheapest dividend ETFs available. The only major competitor in this price tier is SCHD, which also charges 0.06%. NOBL and JEPI both charge 0.35%, which is more than four times DGRO's fee.
| Fund | Expense Ratio | Cost per $10,000/year |
|---|---|---|
| VIG | 0.06% | $6 |
| SCHD | 0.06% | $6 |
| DGRO | 0.08% | $8 |
| NOBL | 0.35% | $35 |
| JEPI | 0.35% | $35 |
The 2-cent difference between DGRO and VIG is negligible over a long holding period — on a $100,000 investment, it amounts to $20 per year. What matters more is the total cost of ownership: commission-free trading through most brokers, tight bid-ask spreads (DGRO's average spread is roughly 1 cent), and no load fees. DGRO is as cheap as dividend ETFs get outside of Vanguard's offerings.
DGRO vs. the competition
DGRO vs. VIG
These are the two closest competitors in the dividend-growth category, and they serve nearly identical roles in the Earn slot. Both screen for companies with consecutive years of dividend increases, both charge under 0.10%, and both produce total returns that roughly track the S&P 500. The difference is screening strictness: DGRO requires 5+ years while VIG requires 10+.
The practical result: DGRO holds ~400 stocks vs. VIG's ~340, yields slightly more (~2.0% vs. ~1.7%), and includes companies with shorter but solid dividend growth streaks. Over full market cycles, their total returns have been very close because both screen for dividend growth rather than yield. DGRO is fine if you prefer the iShares ecosystem or want a broader universe with slightly more current yield. VIG is fine if you want maximum selectivity in dividend growth. It's a style choice, not a quality difference — neither fund is meaningfully better or worse than the other.
DGRO vs. SCHD
This is a more meaningful comparison because the two funds use fundamentally different screening philosophies. SCHD screens for quality across four financial metrics — cash flow to debt, return on equity, dividend yield, and 5-year dividend growth rate — and holds roughly 100 stocks with a ~3.5% current yield. DGRO requires only 5 consecutive years of dividend increases (no quality screen beyond that) and holds ~400 stocks with a ~2.0% current yield.
The practical result: SCHD yields more today (~3.5% vs. ~2.0%) with lower technology exposure and stronger downside resilience in drawdowns. DGRO has higher total returns that track the S&P 500 more closely due to broader diversification and higher tech exposure. Over a full market cycle, DGRO has produced slightly better total returns than SCHD because it does not systematically underweight growth sectors. The tradeoff is that DGRO's current income is lower — investors building toward income-in-retirement may find the 2.0% yield less satisfying in the accumulation phase than SCHD's 3.5%.
DGRO vs. DGRW
Both DGRO (iShares) and DGRW (WisdomTree) target dividend growth, but they use different index providers and methodologies. DGRO tracks the Morningstar US Dividend Growth Index with a 5+ year consecutive dividend increase requirement and holds ~400 stocks at 0.08% expense ratio. DGRW tracks the WisdomTree U.S. Dividend Grower Index, which screens for companies with increasing dividends over the past three years and ranks them by fundamental weight (dividends relative to market cap), producing a portfolio of roughly 150 stocks at 0.39% expense ratio.
The key differences: DGRO is cheaper (0.08% vs. 0.39%), broader (~400 holdings vs. ~150), and uses a longer screening period (5+ years vs. 3 years). DGRW's fundamental weighting means larger dividend payers get proportionally more weight, which can tilt the portfolio toward higher-yielding names within the growth universe. DGRO's equal-weight approach across its broader index produces more diversification but less concentration in the fastest-growing dividend payers. Over full market cycles, both have produced total returns that roughly track the S&P 500 with a dividend-growth overlay — DGRO at lower cost and DGRW with slightly higher yield due to its weighting methodology.
| Feature | DGRO | VIG | SCHD | DGRW | NOBL |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Expense Ratio | 0.08% | 0.06% | 0.06% | 0.39% | 0.35% |
| Current Yield | ~2.0% | ~1.7% | ~3.5% | ~2.5% | ~2.9% |
| Holdings | ~400 | ~340 | ~100 | ~150 | ~70 |
| Div. Growth Screen | 5+ years | 10+ years | 10+ years + quality | 3+ years | 25+ years |
| Best for | Broad dividend growth | Selective dividend growth | Earn default (yield) | Fundamental weighting | Ultra-conservative |
Approximate figures. Verify with fund sponsors before making decisions.
Who should own DGRO
Investors who should consider it
Investors in the accumulation phase who want dividend growth with broader diversification. DGRO is ideal for anyone who wants a dividend fund that grows with them but doesn't need VIG's ultra-selective 10-year screen. The ~2.0% starting yield is higher than VIG's while still being reinvested into companies with proven — if not as long-established — dividend growth track records. At roughly 8–10% annual dividend growth, the income stream doubles every seven to eight years. An investor who starts at age 30 and holds through retirement will see their yield-on-cost increase substantially over time.
iShares ecosystem fans. If you already hold other iShares ETFs or prefer BlackRock's platform, DGRO fits naturally alongside ITOT, IWM, or other iShares products in a single brokerage account. The 0.08% expense ratio is competitive within the iShares lineup, and the fund's broad diversification makes it a solid core holding for anyone building a dividend-growth allocation.
Total-return investors who want a dividend tilt. DGRO's total return over full market cycles roughly tracks the S&P 500, making it suitable for investors who would otherwise hold VOO but want to add a dividend-growth overlay. The fund provides meaningful exposure to technology and healthcare growth sectors while adding the behavioral benefit of receiving quarterly income payments that reinforce holding behavior during drawdowns.
Investors who should look elsewhere
Retirees or near-retirees needing current income. SCHD's ~3.5% yield is roughly twice DGRO's. For investors relying on portfolio income for living expenses, the current yield differential matters significantly. SCHD generates more cash flow today while still growing its dividends over time. DGRO can be a complement to an income-focused fund, but it should not be the sole Earn pick if your priority is sustaining withdrawals from dividend income in the near term.
Ultra-conservative dividend investors. NOBL's 25+ year consecutive dividend increase requirement produces a portfolio of companies that have maintained payments through at least three recessions. DGRO's 5-year bar is significantly less restrictive and includes companies with shorter — though still solid — dividend growth histories. If maximum durability is your priority, NOBL is the more conservative choice.
Dividend analysis
The key insight: broader screen, still meaningful growth
DGRO's dividend profile sits between VIG and SCHD in terms of both yield and screening strictness. The fund's ~2.0% current yield is higher than VIG's ~1.7% but lower than SCHD's ~3.5%. This reflects the 5-year dividend growth screen: it captures companies that are solid growers but haven't yet proven themselves over a full decade, which structurally produces slightly more current income than VIG while maintaining a meaningful focus on dividend compounding.
DGRO investors are buying a blend of current yield and future growth — not as much income today as SCHD, but more than VIG, with the expectation that dividends will compound over time at roughly 8–10% annually. That is not a guarantee; it is a historical trend driven by the quality of the companies in the portfolio and the discipline of the screening methodology. But it is substantially better than evaluating DGRO solely on its starting yield.
Dividend growth rate
| 5-year dividend growth rate | ~8–10% annualized |
| 10-year dividend growth rate | — (fund launched in 2014, under 12 years old) |
| Consecutive annual increases (screening criterion) | 5+ years minimum per holding |
| Screening methodology | 5+ consecutive years of dividend increases; screens for dividend payout ratio; requires positive earnings |
Growth rates are approximate and based on historical index methodology. Verify current figures with fund sponsors.
The compounding math
A dividend that grows at 8–10% annually doubles roughly every seven to nine years. An investor who bought DGRO at inception in 2014 and held through today has seen their yield-on-cost increase from its starting point as the underlying holdings grew their dividends. If this trajectory continues, an investor starting today at a ~2.0% yield could expect their yield-on-cost to reach approximately 4.5–6.0% after 10–14 years — more than double the starting point through dividend compounding alone. That is the power of dividend growth investing: the income stream compounds independently of market performance.
Compare this to a fund like JEPI, which yields ~8% today but does not have a structural mechanism for dividend compounding. JEPI's yield is generated from covered call premiums that reset based on current market conditions — it can go up or down depending on volatility and stock prices. DGRO's dividend growth comes from the underlying companies' earnings growth, which compounds organically over time. The patient investor who can wait for the compounding to become visible is rewarded by DGRO's trajectory.
Risks and considerations
Technology concentration. DGRO has meaningful exposure to technology — the sector that has driven the majority of S&P 500 returns over the past decade. When technology leads the market, DGRO benefits. But this also means DGRO does not provide the defensive character of quality-dividend funds like SCHD or NOBL, which are structurally underweight tech. In a sustained tech correction, DGRO would decline more than those alternatives. The Five Fund Frame addresses sector balance by pairing DGRO (Earn) with VXUS (Roam), which provides international diversification beyond U.S. technology.
Shorter dividend growth track record at the holding level. While DGRO's 5-year payment history requirement filters for durability, it is a significantly lower bar than VIG's 10-year or NOBL's 25-year requirements. Some holdings may have grown their dividends through only one economic cycle rather than multiple. In a severe recession, some of these companies could cut dividends — the fund would remove persistent cutters at its annual reconstitution, but investors may experience temporary income reduction during downturns. This is a manageable risk at the ETF level, but it is real and worth understanding.
Interest rate sensitivity. Dividend stocks compete with bonds for income-seeking investors. When interest rates rise sharply — as they did in 2022 — dividend funds often sell off as investors rotate toward bonds and cash. DGRO fell less than the S&P 500 in 2022 but still declined meaningfully. Rising rate environments create headwinds for dividend equities broadly, and DGRO is not immune.
Fund age. DGRO launched in June 2014 — it has been managing money for roughly 12 years as of this writing. That is a solid track record but significantly shorter than VIG's ~20-year history or SCHD's ~15-year history. DGRO has not yet experienced a full decade-long bear market cycle, which means its performance in severe prolonged downturns is less well-documented than its older competitors. This is not a reason to avoid the fund — it has performed well across its entire history — but it is a consideration for investors who prefer funds with longer track records.
How DGRO fits in the Five Fund Frame
In the Core Three configuration, DGRO fills Earn alongside VOO (Build) and SGOV (Park). It is the income-growth engine of a version of the Frame designed for investors who want broader dividend-growth exposure with slightly more current yield than VIG provides.
DGRO's role in the Five Fund Frame is distinct from SCHD's and VIG's. Where SCHD generates meaningful current income that grows over time, DGRO generates total return close to the S&P 500 with a dividend-growth overlay and slightly higher starting yield than VIG. All three belong in the Earn slot, but they serve different investor profiles within it. SCHD is the default Earn pick for investors who want income now that grows. VIG is the Earn pick for investors buying maximum-selectivity dividend growth. DGRO is the Earn pick for investors who want a broader dividend-growth screen with slightly more current yield — anyone who prefers the iShares ecosystem or simply wants a wider universe of companies.
The allocation to Earn should reflect where investors are in their financial lives. Early in the accumulation phase, Earn at 10% with DGRO is mostly about behavioral anchoring — the quarterly dividend payment reinforces holding behavior during drawdowns while total return compounds alongside the broader market. As investors approach retirement, Earn growing to 30–40% of the portfolio creates an income stream that has grown substantially from its ~2.0% starting point through years of dividend compounding — potentially reaching a yield-on-cost of 5–7% or more for long-term holders.
| Life stage | Suggested Earn allocation | Context |
|---|---|---|
| 20s | 10% | Behavioral anchoring; total return compounds alongside broader market |
| 30s | 15–20% | Dividend compounding accelerates; yield-on-cost begins to matter |
| 40s | 20–30% | Income stream growing meaningfully from starting point |
| 50s+ | 30–40% | Yield-on-cost potentially 5–7%+ for long-term holders; income becomes meaningful |
Suggested allocations are illustrative, not prescriptive. Adjust based on your individual circumstances and risk tolerance.
Full broker comparison: Best broker for ETF investing →